On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 12:48:27PM +0000, mallum wrote:
> gtk2 does offer 'real' AA support, i8n, nicer api, and imporved
> widgets ( no more sucky trees ). I also remember reading its due to
> have an initial release next month ?
>
> Thinking ahead ( very ahead! ), if gtk2 would build with uclibc [1]
> ( doubtful at the mo - no thread support as yet, though tinyX does
> apparently build with it ) and even XCB [2] , then the space loss
> could be recovered.
I don't think uclibc itself supports i18n, which would rather
negate that particular advantage of gtk+2.
p.
Received on Sat Jan 12 10:30:14 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:41:27 EDT