> Wouldn't it be a good idea to start using gtk+ 2.0 now for two reasons
> 1) It's a moving target and as such we have a great possibility to get
> code into it. If the patches that are needed to get gtk+ to work good
> on small screens are included in the final 2.0 that would be good. This
> is a great chance to influence (and avoid having to keep track of
> special patches)
Gtk 2.0's Api was largely completed mid-last year, and now it is
definately feature frozen, so anything we would be doing would have to be
independant of it while it was stabalising. All of the main feature set
for GTK 2.0 was decided way before GUADEC in march.
> 2) It's fully internationalized, which means we will go international
> from the beginning instead of adding that in the future.
Gtk1.0 is heavily localisable, (to within 1 byte character sets which is
quite a few) using gettext etc.
owen
-- Owen Cliffe, Ph.D. Student, Dept. Computer Science University of BathReceived on Sat Jan 12 2002 - 13:57:15 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:18:59 EDT