Re: Re: gtk2?

From: Robert Mibus <mibus_at_bigpond.com>
Date: 13 Jan 2002 12:24:01 +1030

> > They told us that GTK+2 would not offer that many benefits and that it
> > will be even larger than GTK+1.
> > IMHO we should stick to GTK+1 for now. It has proven to be stable and
> > offers enough for us.
>
> I built gtk2 (1.3 ) for ARM the other week. The tests ran fine ( on my
> ARM desktop ) and it seems most stuff is there. It is bigger than
> gtk1.2 ( the main gtk lib is an extra meg - stripped ). I do need to
> investigate it more however.
Don't forget we get to ditch gdk_imlib! I don't like having to jump
through hoops with it. (Ok, two lines to load an image isn't terrible,
but gtk_image_new_from_file("x.png") is *so* much nicer :)

Did you need ATK? Or is it safe to ditch at compile-time? IMO it would
be good to use gtk2 because:
 1. AA. Mmmmmm :)
 2. By the time familiar and/or GPE gets to 1.0, it'll be "old".
 3. It's shiny and new ;-D

mibus

-- 
Robert Mibus <mibus_at_bigpond.com>
chown -R us.us yourbase
Received on Sat Jan 12 2002 - 17:54:35 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:18:59 EDT