RE: PIM databases (SQLlite vs. XML arguments)

From: Owen Cliffe <occ_at_cs.bath.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 03:03:42 +0000 (GMT)

If you read the SyncML spec, it has lots of information about the minimum
requirements for actually syncing data, like where you need to keep
timestamps etc. see www.syncml.org

On 10 Feb 2002, Adam Lydick wrote:

> After reading over the replies I recieved, I've come to the conclusion
> that while I still feel that XML could work just fine as a backend,
> sqllite would require less effort to get it to work. I'll just deal with
> the extra 100K of flash usage.
>
> I'll resubmit my sync proposal in SQL when I get the chance.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
>
> _______________________________________________
> GPE mailing list
> GPE_at_handhelds.org
> http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/gpe
>
>
>

-- 
Owen Cliffe, Ph.D. Student, Dept. Computer Science
University of Bath
Received on Sun Feb 10 2002 - 19:03:13 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:18:59 EDT