Hi,
[Discussion about SyncML synchronization, see GpeSync on Wiki]
> This really sounds interesting. Christian, are you reading the GPE
> mailing list by chance? (http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/gpe)
>
I wasn't, but I just got subscribed. I tried yesterday GPE, and
congratulations to everyone, it's great and promising! I keep busy
working on gsynchro, the GPL SyncML server/client I'm currently
developping. I think it would be great if it could be used for GPE.
Hopefully a beta will be released this month (at least I hope so) and
it will be more concrete.
However a GPE gsynchro client would be much easier to develop if all
the synchronizable applications followed this three requirements:
1. assign an unique ID for each entry, better if the application don't
try to "recycle" deleted items IDs. A self-incrementing 32-bit
integer is more than enough.
2. keep trace of modifications, with a modified flag.
3. block any modification during the synchronization and reload data
on the end of the synchronization.
So here are the questions:
* It seems that GPE applications already comply with the first required,
do they?
* For the 2, would it be easy to do? Have the PIM applications
developpers already thought about that? Are they ready to do that?
* For the 3, I guess we need some RPC solution to communicate between
the synchronization applications and the SyncML client, I guess in
the same way the «Today» application would do. Which one do GPE
use? If there is no one used right now, which do you plan to use?
* About Gtk, are you planning to migrate to Gtk2 anytime soon?
* Is somebody working on some synchronization stuff right now?
Best regards,
-- Christian Gillot <cgillot_at_gruposbd.com> http://www.neo-rousseaux.org/cgillot GNU/Linux programmerReceived on Thu Oct 10 2002 - 05:04:32 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:19:02 EDT