I don't believe that reviewing _public_ specs can endanger you in any
fashion. If you have to sign (digitally or otherwise) an agreement this
might not be true. Regardless, if you are "violating" someone's patent
you have a problem even if you are not aware of the details of it. So
avoiding the information doesn't help you. (and might hurt, because you
don't know what they have patented)
Cheers,
Adam
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 11:55, Andreas Motl wrote:
<snip>
>
> p.s.: Do you see any possibility for me to look at some parts of the syncml-
> specification without breaking anything related to patent stuff and the GPL?
> I don't do this for now until i'm not completely sure about this, but
> of course i would like to adapt the interface specs to enable feeding
> of syncml documents to Data::Transfer::Sync.... Can you help? Please help!
> Otherwise we would make up a new DTD for this purpose although we
> currently do very well with 'sync.pl' together with mapping-metadata
> supplied
> by an additional Perl-module. (abstraction-level=medium)
> Please also direct me to other mailing lists if i'm completely out of scope
> here.
>
Received on Tue Feb 25 2003 - 07:27:09 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:19:03 EDT