Re: CVS usage

Good point,

while i guess we do have obvious divisions between application types,
there doesn't seem that much point in making those devisions in CVS.

it is basically arbitrary:
 CVSROOT=:gserver:foo_at_handhelds.org:/cvs/gpe/apps/myapp
vs
 CVSROOT=:gserver:foo_at_handhelds.org:/cvs/gpe/myapp

i vote to save the 5 characters and at least keep the cvs structure
single-leveled.

owen

On Sun, 2002-03-24 at 19:43, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-03-24 at 17:41, Nils Faerber wrote:
> > Base should contain all basic parts that form a ready to go GPE
> > environment, all basics. Apps contains different applications, games is
> > obvious and pim the upcoming PIMs. They should have an extra hirarchy
> > because they share the common PIM "attribute" and maybe they share even
> > more like specialized PIM libs which would then also go into the pim tree.
> > Finally the addon directory could include mostly anything else.
> >
> > Is this aggreeable?
>
> Sounds OK to me. Out of interest, what were the reasons for not putting
> everything in CVSROOT?
>
> p.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GPE mailing list
> GPE_at_handhelds.org
> http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/gpe
>
>
Received on Sun Mar 24 2002 - 23:33:05 EST