RE: pim schema

Yes, I believe this is along the lines that I was thinking. I would
like to have a "view" that would say have a calender, contacts, todo,
etc for just work. The same for perhaps play, school, etc and/or combine
them as needed. So I can make sure work doesn't interfere with play ;)

digger

On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 19:38, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> In point of fact, it appears to be a general grouping facility. If one were
> so inclined, one could put Calendar items, Contact items, and other PIM
> items into a group. Not with the current schema, but in concept. We'd have
> to extend the schema to implement this in actuality.
>
> This could be quite useful. I could search for all PIM items associated
> with a group, which might be (for example) a particular event.
>
> --- Noel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Owen Cliffe
>
> Originally somebody proposed both adressbook and calendar
> categories/groups and i didn't see whey they shouldn't be merged into a
> single scheme.
>
> you are right categories might be a more accurate (although
> unfortunately longer... name)
>
> the relational model gpe_person_groups does imply that one person can
> belong to more than one group.
>
> On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 22:44, digger vermont wrote:
> > In general are groups what I might call a category?
> >
> > And then, there is:
> >
> > create table gpe_groups(
> > id int NOT NULL,
> > name text UNIQUE,
> >
> > And further down:
> >
> > create table gpe_person_groups(
> > person_id int NOT NULL,
> > group_id int NOT NULL,
> > PRIMARY KEY(person_id,group_id)
> >
> > If so can a person belong to more than one [group]?
>
> _______________________________________________
> GPE mailing list
> GPE@handhelds.org
> http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/gpe
Received on Sat Apr 20 03:15:11 2002