On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 18:49, Joseph J. McCarthy wrote:
> Before an "official" public release I will need to clean a few GUI
> things that are in the process of being implemented, but that are really
> "add-ons" (like recurrence of events, a week view, etc.) and do not
> currently work.
I've just checked in a few more gpe-calendar changes.
The most notable one was adding the "summary" field to the SQL schema.
This is unfortunately not backwards-compatible; you will need to delete
.gpe/calendar and allow a new database to be created. Obviously you
will lose all your events in the process.
Once a public release exists, changing the schema like this probably
wouldn't be acceptable. So we need to make an effort now to ensure that
it's OK for the future: this means working out how we are going to store
recurrence, even if it doesn't get implemented. I think Derrell posted
some thoughts just before I went on holiday, and I'll look over them
later today.
p.
Received on Sun May 26 2002 - 10:44:10 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 17:19:00 EDT