Re: [Fwd: Re: PIM Schema ideas]

From: Damien Tanner <dctanner.a.t.magenet.com>
Date: Thu Jun 06 2002 - 15:23:54 EDT

Can we just stick with _one_ name entry, it makes life soo much easier
:/

dctanner.

On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 19:13, Tom wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:54:49AM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > The problem I have with the scheme is the presence of the name string in the
> > person table. I might want a more sophisticated name scheme (e.g., title,
> > first, middle, last, suffix). The "name" might the "display name", I
> > suppose.
>
> Middle names are very uncommon in most of europe, AFAIK. Even people
> who have them rarely use them.
>
> Then we have countries with different naming conventions. More than
> three names is very common in arabic countries. Other countries use the
> family name first, the given name last.
>
> It's really the same as addresses - a generic text field gives you the
> most freedom and is the only thing guaranteed to work for everyone.
>
>
>
> --
> New GPG Key issued (old key expired):
> http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
> pub 1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
> Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4 29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5
> _______________________________________________
> GPE mailing list
> GPE@handhelds.org
> http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/gpe
Received on Thu Jun 06 18:21:24 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:41:28 EDT