Re: GTK

On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 22:25, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 13:41, Robert Mibus wrote:
> > Any gtk apps complain they can't find libgcc_s.so.1. ldd seems to point
> > to libgdk as the culprit. (By complain, I mean complain-and-wont-run :)
>
> Gack, whoops. I built those libraries with GCC 3.1 and must have
> forgotten to add -static-libgcc for GDK. In the longer term we probably
> want to start shipping libgcc_s.so.1 in a package of its own.
Hmm, libgtk is also linked to it; I assumed at the time that it was
picking libgcc_s up a dependency of libgdk. (libglade and libgdk_pixbuf
also show it, but aren't dependant on it themselves). A quick grep shows
libgtk as the only library still mentioning libgcc_s.

> I'm uploading a 1.2.10-2 package now, should be in unstable within 30
> minutes or so.
Time for -3 :-D

> p.
mibus

-- 
Robert Mibus <mibus_at_bigpond.com>
I am dyslexic of Borg.  Prepare to have your ass laminated.