Re: *****SPAM***** gpe-mail 0.0.1 released

Not sure if some or all of this is gpe-mail's or your MTA's fault:

On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 02:38, erez_at_savan.com wrote:
> SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
> SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
> SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
> SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
> SPAM:
> SPAM: Content analysis details: (5.3 hits, 5 required)
> SPAM: MAY_BE_FORGED (1.6 points) 'Received:' has 'may be forged' warning
> SPAM: NO_REAL_NAME (0.5 points) From: does not include a real name
> SPAM: INVALID_DATE (0.5 points) Invalid Date: header (not RFC 822)
> SPAM: DOUBLE_CAPSWORD (1.1 points) BODY: A word in all caps repeated on the line
> SPAM: DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 (1.6 points) Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date
> SPAM:
> SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------
>
> hi
>
> I have just released gpe-mail V0.0.1 (in unstable)
>
> this is a porting of my pymap app to C
>
> gpe-mail has the basic functionality
> pymap is still more advanced (yet)
>
>
> btw: this mail was sent using gpe-mail
>
> erez
> _______________________________________________
> GPE mailing list
> GPE_at_handhelds.org
> http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/gpe

-- 
Wes Kurdziolek
Virginia Tech Computer Science Lab
UNIX System Administrator
E-mail: wkurdzio_at_cslab.vt.edu