"Hicks, Jamey" <Jamey.Hicks@hp.com> writes:
> In what way is ipkg not handling versioned dependences?
I'm pretty sure I once had an occasion where it didn't respect a
Depends line like foo (>= 0.12-3), but I forgot the details. I'll
keep an eye on it, now that I know that it's supposed to work.
It also didn't complain about a specification like "foo (0.12+)", or
is this considered valid syntax?
In the specific case of "tux-48", I now see it is a packaging
bug. Please make sure you get gpe-icons 0.13. I'll upload a fixed
gpe-ownerinfo package.
Cheers,
Colin
-- YYURYYUBICURYY4ME.Received on Wed Sep 11 20:28:45 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 09:41:29 EDT